You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am using ROS kinetic in Ubuntu 16.04 and the most updated version of rviz that comes from apt.
I have two reference frames: parent_a_link, and parent_b_link. I also have the tf transformation between parent_a_link and parent_b_link. This transformation includes a rotation and a translation.
I publish a nav_msgs/Path message as path with frame_id parent_b_link.
If my Global Options -> Fixed Frame is parent_b_link, everything works fine.
But if my Global Options -> Fixed Frame is parent_a_link, then the orientation of the poses of the path is not correctly displayed. It seems that the displayed orientation is the orientation of the poses in parent_b_link (and should be shown the orientation in parent_a_link).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I cannot reproduce this issue with rviz 1.13.3: The path points and frames perfectly move with the TF transform:
Note that nav_msgs/Path involves a global header and individual headers for all mentioned poses. However, only the global one is considered by rviz! I consider it a design flaw to have multiple headers in this message: it's not clear which one to use.
I am using ROS kinetic in Ubuntu 16.04 and the most updated version of rviz that comes from apt.
I have two reference frames: parent_a_link, and parent_b_link. I also have the tf transformation between parent_a_link and parent_b_link. This transformation includes a rotation and a translation.
I publish a nav_msgs/Path message as path with frame_id parent_b_link.
If my Global Options -> Fixed Frame is parent_b_link, everything works fine.
But if my Global Options -> Fixed Frame is parent_a_link, then the orientation of the poses of the path is not correctly displayed. It seems that the displayed orientation is the orientation of the poses in parent_b_link (and should be shown the orientation in parent_a_link).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: