Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question regarding the iteration number #106

Open
ericlearning opened this issue Oct 11, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Question regarding the iteration number #106

ericlearning opened this issue Oct 11, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@ericlearning
Copy link

It seems like in line 80 of train.py, the step is changed only when used_sample > phase x 2. This makes sense in resolution >= 16x16, because each step is transition + stablization.

But in 8x8, alpha=1 all the time. So if I am understanding correctly, all transitions and stabilization are trained for "phase" (600,000) samples, except the 8x8 stabilization for phase x 2 (1,200,000) samples, right?

Is this behavior consistent with the original implementation? I expected 8x8 stablization to also train for "phase" samples.

Also, thank you for this amazing repo!

@rosinality
Copy link
Owner

rosinality commented Oct 12, 2020

Somewhat different. In the official implementations initial resolutions trained without phase transition steps, and trained with 600k images.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants