Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

"thingspeak" really needs to just be a "downsample" output option #8

Open
rpj opened this issue Dec 31, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

"thingspeak" really needs to just be a "downsample" output option #8

rpj opened this issue Dec 31, 2018 · 0 comments
Assignees
@rpj
Labels
code-smells-bad Not exactly a bug (things still work), but not ideal P3 Priority 3

Comments

@rpj
Copy link
Owner

rpj commented Dec 31, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Could even implicitly enable via a URL scheme for -o such as thingspeak://WRITE_API_KEY@CHANNEL_ID. Also, downsample really needs to be re-factored. Should probably file a separate bug for that...: #10
@rpj rpj added the code-smells-bad Not exactly a bug (things still work), but not ideal label Dec 31, 2018
@rpj rpj self-assigned this Dec 31, 2018
@rpj rpj changed the title thingspeak really needs to just be a downsample output option "thingspeak" really needs to just be a "downsample" output option Dec 31, 2018
@rpj rpj mentioned this issue Dec 31, 2018
Open
@rpj rpj added P2 Priority 2 P3 Priority 3 and removed P2 Priority 2 labels Jan 3, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@rpj rpj

Labels
code-smells-bad Not exactly a bug (things still work), but not ideal P3 Priority 3
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@rpj