You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 9, 2024. It is now read-only.
Line below seems like it ought to create a rectangle with width of 10 and height of 10. Instead, it creates a rectangle with a width of greater than 10 and height of 1, at least for what is in the viewable area.
ggvis(data=data.frame(x=0,y=0,h=10,w=10),~x,~y,height=~h,width=~w) %>% layer_rects()
I have also seen some cases where the rectangles will overflow the plot area.
A workaround is to supply x2/y2 instead of width/height, but this results in different animation behavior when the sign of the height changes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Line below seems like it ought to create a rectangle with width of 10 and height of 10. Instead, it creates a rectangle with a width of greater than 10 and height of 1, at least for what is in the viewable area.
ggvis(data=data.frame(x=0,y=0,h=10,w=10),~x,~y,height=~h,width=~w) %>% layer_rects()
I have also seen some cases where the rectangles will overflow the plot area.
A workaround is to supply x2/y2 instead of width/height, but this results in different animation behavior when the sign of the height changes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ca21/9ca2102de139c60dd14650d62dedad4682c7f1fd" alt="plot_975901063"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: