Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 29, 2024. It is now read-only.

Uplift and Cross Validation #13

Open
shaddyab opened this issue Dec 31, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Uplift and Cross Validation #13

shaddyab opened this issue Dec 31, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@shaddyab
Copy link
Contributor

Should stratified cross-validation based on the Treatment vs Outcome 2x2 matrix split be used when performing a grid search to ensure that each fold follows the same distribution used in the overall data? If this is not the case, and cross validation is used for hyperparameter search, should we expect that the scores used for evaluating each fold, using qini coefficient as an example, indeed represent the qini coefficient for the overall training dataset? Putting it differently, an increase in number of folds may affect the stability of the uplift score in each fold.

Another closely related question, given the following two cross validation outputs, which one should we prefer? Higher mean score across folds, or uniform score across folds?

Number of cross folds: 4
Split_1_Score | split_2_Score | Split_3_Score | Split_4_Score | Mean_Score
0.4 0.9 -0.2 -0.3 | 0.2

Number of cross folds: 2
Split_1_Score | split_2_Score | Mean_Score
0.12 0.16 | 0.14

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant