You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Progress on soil moisture in high latitudes? @jiafumao
I have reviewed@ypwong22 pull request which includes some changes to the ILAMB library. We need to step through this carefully as there is some logic which assumes things like noleap calendars which won't work on other models.
Are our biomass datasets consistently reporting carbon and not total biomass? See confirm biomass units as carbon versus biomass? #35 which @ckoven brings up. It seems the new ESACCI product is total which would explain the factor of ~2 difference in the comparison plots. We should check our other products, volunteers?
I have re-encoded the NCSCD data to produce two products cSoil and cSoilAbove1m. There is a difference in this and the NCSCDV22 product that we encoded long ago, seems to be from interpolation. Is the spatial variability so high that we shouldn't regrid?
There are other datasets available as per this ESSD paper. Should we chase these down and encode?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We have several datasets encoded, there are others in this ESSD paper, but there is a lot of variance. What products are recommended for our purpose of confronting models?
noleap
calendars which won't work on other models.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: