You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have ended up with two different designs for pages that index collections with a filter. We would like to unify them in one design by changing the design of /staff/pets to match the others.
Some notable differences:
manage_fosters design puts the content in a bootstrap container class which is limiting how wide it will expand. pets expands to full viewport width no matter how large screen width gets.
manage_fosters design places the filter content in a white rounded rectangle
manage_fosters desktop design places the buttons below the inputs while pets spreads them away from inputs.
manage_fosters design has inputs equal width and they expand to container width. pets they have fixed widths for form inputs, and they wrap.
The tables themselves are also different, but in these cases that is intentional, and I think they can remain unchanged for now.
One thing that is nice that we want to keep is:
"Search" button and "clear filters" for mobile views in pets design expand full width.
Let's go ahead and apply that button styling to manage_fosters index and adopter_applications_review index.
If there are any differences that are unclear to you, please feel free to ask for clarification here or on slack.
Acceptance Criteria
Refactor app/views/organizations/staff/pets/index.html.erb to match the app/views/organizations/staff/manage_fosters/index.html.erb layout
Apply mobile button sizing of search button and clear filter to:
Pending
#547
Description
We have ended up with two different designs for pages that index collections with a filter. We would like to unify them in one design by changing the design of
/staff/pets
to match the others.Some notable differences:
manage_fosters
design puts the content in a bootstrapcontainer
class which is limiting how wide it will expand.pets
expands to full viewport width no matter how large screen width gets.manage_fosters
design places the filter content in a white rounded rectanglemanage_fosters
desktop design places the buttons below the inputs whilepets
spreads them away from inputs.manage_fosters
design has inputs equal width and they expand to container width.pets
they have fixed widths for form inputs, and they wrap.The tables themselves are also different, but in these cases that is intentional, and I think they can remain unchanged for now.
One thing that is nice that we want to keep is:
pets
design expand full width.Let's go ahead and apply that button styling to
manage_fosters
index andadopter_applications_review
index.If there are any differences that are unclear to you, please feel free to ask for clarification here or on slack.
Acceptance Criteria
app/views/organizations/staff/pets/index.html.erb
to match theapp/views/organizations/staff/manage_fosters/index.html.erb
layoutapp/views/organizations/staff/manage_fosters/index.html.erb
app/views/organizations/staff/adoption_application_reviews/index.html.erb
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: