You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I feel that, a common practice is to allocate 70% or 80% of the data for training and the remaining 30% or 20% for testing. This split is often used when you have a moderate-sized dataset. In some cases, where the dataset is relatively large, we might choose a 60% training and 40% testing split. This allows for more data to be used for training, which can be beneficial if our model is complex and requires a larger amount of training data.
On getting the data we need to decide what form of training/test split we would be doing
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: