Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Figuring what data augmentation split we would be using #13

Open
beffiong1 opened this issue Jun 7, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Figuring what data augmentation split we would be using #13

beffiong1 opened this issue Jun 7, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@beffiong1
Copy link
Collaborator

On getting the data we need to decide what form of training/test split we would be doing

@beffiong1 beffiong1 self-assigned this Jun 7, 2023
@Manaswini1208
Copy link
Collaborator

I feel that, a common practice is to allocate 70% or 80% of the data for training and the remaining 30% or 20% for testing. This split is often used when you have a moderate-sized dataset. In some cases, where the dataset is relatively large, we might choose a 60% training and 40% testing split. This allows for more data to be used for training, which can be beneficial if our model is complex and requires a larger amount of training data.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants