Skip to content

considerations on parking #1063

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
softprops opened this issue Sep 19, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

considerations on parking #1063

softprops opened this issue Sep 19, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@softprops
Copy link

I am aware that crates.io is uses first come first serve policy for publish crates but I find this use questionable an cause for the concern

screen shot 2017-09-19 at 1 05 26 am

What your seeing is what a first time rust user would see when visiting crates.io in the very first list of crates to select from.

If you look at these 0.0.0 crates you will find no code and you may actually never find code if you do not meet this users policy for reclaiming the name

some excerps from the current owners crate home page home

I've reserved some crate names on crates.io for future use.
I'm willing to turn over any crate names to interested parties under some criteria:
Your crate is a significant contribution to the ecosystem and not just e.g. some test project or something you never intend to finish.
You actually have it almost done so that its usable by other people

There is a bit of irony in there in that this person is trying to ensure the crate.io ecosystem is not polluted but the way they are going about doing so is what I'd consider polluting, in a way its defaming a good portion of the crate.io home page. The hub for crate discovery!

@softprops
Copy link
Author

I do not expect a policing policy but I'm aware one of the efforts of 2017 is to make good quality crates easier to discover. This users's behavior seems to be directly working against this goal. I think there should be a means of reported abuse.

@carols10cents
Copy link
Member

As you note, this isn't against the crates.io policies, so we are not going to remove these crates.

What your seeing is what a first time rust user would see when visiting crates.io in the very first list of crates to select from.

These crates will scroll off the "newest crates" list soon.

I'm aware one of the efforts of 2017 is to make good quality crates easier to discover. This users's behavior seems to be directly working against this goal.

We plan to continue the work we've been doing to increase signals of good crates for people to use when evaluating crates. The name shouldn't be the only indication that you've found a good crate, and we are giving and plan to continue giving more information to crate users to help them find the best crates.

Thank you for the issue!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants