Claim ownership: spins, please wait: does not complete . defect 240812 1740

[DG12]

Logged in as [email protected]. I have C1:9A:0B:19:3B:B6. I wanted to share it but says no owner.
Tap Claim Ownership,

Spins,
Please wait ... 12:24,12:25,12:26,,, 12:33
Tap everywhere, no longer spinning, can not exit. Close app.

Start app. Still.logged in as [email protected].
Ruuvi 3B86 is present. Owner D***2@c***u.us (too much security :-{ . Oops found [email protected] (?) from previous??_)Very interesting but not nice !
Share option is correctly not present( logged in as [email protected] who is not owner).
tap Force Claim
display: Force Claim is done...
3.When sucessfully...

(Use NFC) (Use BT)
Tap NFC . Successfully owned by logged in user [email protected].

Share with [email protected]
Successfully shared... << Not really!)

See issue#2106 possible related.

Feel free to attempt to claim C1:9A:0B:19:3B:86.
Tricky I guess, since I have it. Maybe you could fake NFC? Fake MAC ?

[markoaamunkajo]

I can add this sensor MAC in WebUI, so from my "perspective" it looks like it was never claimed to an account.
Asking Otso to confirm about this.

[markoaamunkajo]

Cloud should return 409 if sensor was already claimed.

I reconfirmed that this sensor has not been seen by Ruuvi Gateway (at least in the way that any data was sent to Ruuvi Cloud).

Maybe this issue could be about your Ruuvi Gateway @DG12 not being connected to internet or this sensor being out of range of Ruuvi Gateway? Or the given MAC address can be incorrect.

[DG12]

Hmmm. Typo of Mac in the issue. Should have been C1:9A:0B:19:3B:86 .
I have revised typos in original post
OOPs

However, sharing does not require user to enter MAC.
Now I don't know how the wrong MAC got in there!?

Just for good luck I removed marko@ruuvi and shared it again successfully.

[markoaamunkajo]

I received sensor successfully too. I am confused about this issue, I think it must have been that user had no updated ownership data available from cloud to the app so it created this issue. I will ask Otso more about this scenario when we do tests gain.

Owner is [email protected] for this sensor, which seems correct.

[markoaamunkajo]

Moving to backlog as it needs more investigation but cannot be reproduced right now