Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 5, 2021. It is now read-only.

Package install of v0.4 does not work #25

Open
trevorloader opened this issue Aug 8, 2016 · 8 comments
Open

Package install of v0.4 does not work #25

trevorloader opened this issue Aug 8, 2016 · 8 comments
Labels

Comments

@trevorloader
Copy link

Hey Ryan,

Love your package, but the latest version 0.4 does not install properly into a clean v7.4.3 site. After installing the zip via the Developer > Packages, when you go to create the data type, Epiphany SEO is not in the list of available data types.

I tried, restarting the website etc, but nothing made it appear.

So I uninstalled and went back to version 0.2.1 which installs and works perfectly.

Thanks
Trevor

@swollaert
Copy link

swollaert commented Aug 9, 2016

I have the same issue with v7.4.1
I installed the package through the package repository.

@ryanlewis
Copy link
Owner

This was changed in recent versions from Epiphany SEO Metadata to SEO Metadata in the dropdown. The alias renamed unchanged.

Could you check again for the available data types for SEO Metadata?

@swollaert
Copy link

I have reinstalled package version 0.4
image

In the Property Editor dropdown I can' select 'SEO Metadata'
image

@ryanlewis
Copy link
Owner

Aha - it looks like you have installed it as an Umbraco package - did you also install it this way @trevorloader ?

I usually use Nuget to install this package - maybe something has changed, I'll have to take a look. In the meantime, if you are using Visual Studio you can install it via Nuget with

Install-Package Epiphany.SeoMetadata

@swollaert
Copy link

Thanks for checking it out. I'm not using Visual Studio at the moment.

I'm running our umbraco website on azure.
Do you know a guide to setup umbraco development with Visual Studio?

@ryanlewis
Copy link
Owner

This guide is considered the most up to date.

I would always recommend managing projects this way - it allows you to update Umbraco easily, and many other extensions now prefer to use Umbraco.

@swollaert
Copy link

Thanks! I'll have a look

@trevorloader
Copy link
Author

Yes, I installed the package file via the umbraco back end. And is definitely not installing properly. If you are not supporting the package install, I'd remove it from our.umbraco. Cheers, T

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants