Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider rule names, make configurable #16

Open
rzach opened this issue Oct 1, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Consider rule names, make configurable #16

rzach opened this issue Oct 1, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@rzach
Copy link
Owner

rzach commented Oct 1, 2017

Not all rule labels are produced by macros, and the style file has two sets for them. Make that uniform.

Also as suggested in #11 by @catrincm, avoid Latin. ECQ is Explosion, TND law of excluded middle.
@rzach
Copy link
Owner Author

rzach commented Oct 1, 2017

@catrincm that is an excellent point. What do you call Modus ponens? Modus tollens? Anything else that needs changing?

@catrincm
Copy link

catrincm commented Oct 1, 2017

Modus Ponens is such a familar term that it's useful for them to know that. Modus tollens too is relatively used (more than TND) and I don't know of any nice alternatives. It was just the TND and ECQ I was thinking about.

I've opened new comment about one further point on the choice of rules: #17.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@rzach @catrincm