Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OPCODES MACLIB in a future VM/370CE #93

Open
rvjansen opened this issue Jan 3, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

OPCODES MACLIB in a future VM/370CE #93

rvjansen opened this issue Jan 3, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@rvjansen
Copy link

rvjansen commented Jan 3, 2024

As a result of a discussion on the hercules list OPCODES VMARC came in the picture, when I tested it on VM/370 it turned out that a newer maclib format was used in the downloaded version (I used it on newer VM versions) and I sent the package to Bob and the link to Jay Moseley's page to the list. I could have done better by opening an issue here to avoid duplication of work; so I am correcting that error now.

The attached OPCODES VMARC seems newer and more complete than Jay Moseley's version of Stephen Powell's macro package. I also attach this package as I have it.

OPCODES.LISTING.TXT (ASCII) indicates the differences between this package and the OPCODES MACLIB that Dave has uploaded.
opcodes.listing.txt

This is the package that I already had and used (and don't know where I got it) (zipped binary vmarc)
opcodes.vmarc.zip

It would be great if we could include a complete version of this in the next VM/370 CE.

@BobBolch BobBolch self-assigned this Jan 15, 2024
@BobBolch
Copy link
Collaborator

I am comparing any differences between these libraries.

@rvjansen
Copy link
Author

rvjansen commented Jan 16, 2024

Great! Note that MVS tk5- also has a library full of macro's for assembler XF: SYS2.SXMACLIB on TK5RES - with exactly the same purpose, to add missing instructions as macro's.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants