Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add OME-Zarr support #157

Open
martinschorb opened this issue Nov 6, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Add OME-Zarr support #157

martinschorb opened this issue Nov 6, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@martinschorb
Copy link
Contributor

martinschorb commented Nov 6, 2023

Hi @trautmane ,

when meeting @bogovicj some time ago at EMBL, he told me that adding support for OME-Zarr metadata to the n5 client would be a matter of adding/modifying just a couple of lines.

We get a growing number of requests for OME-Zarr volumes. Do you think it would be possible to extend the code (maybe even upstream in the N5 libs) to enable this?

Thanks a lot!

@trautmane
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @martinschorb ,

That sounds good/reasonable to me, but I'd need to get a better understanding of the OME-Zarr metadata spec. Do you know minimally what your requestors need? I also wonder how stable the OME-Zarr metadata spec is at this time? Finally, I wonder how this relates to the NGFF spec (maybe it is the same thing)?

@martinschorb
Copy link
Contributor Author

martinschorb commented Nov 7, 2023

Do you know minimally what your requestors need?

Basically a volume that meets the current OME-Zarr/NGFF specs.

https://github.com/ome/ngff

I also wonder how stable the OME-Zarr metadata spec is at this time? Finally, I wonder how this relates to the NGFF spec (maybe it is the same thing)?

see above. I think for simple things such as static volumes, I would not expect it to change much.

Probably your in-house experts @bogovicj , @mkitti , or @virginiascarlett are much more into it.

@trautmane
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @martinschorb - just wanted to let you know that I got the chance to chat with @bogovicj about this on November 17th. I'm busy this week but hope to start work on this next week using the information I got from John. Sorry for the delay.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants