Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nitpick: GP doesn't stand for "Go Pari"…? #39096

Open
user202729 opened this issue Dec 9, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

nitpick: GP doesn't stand for "Go Pari"…? #39096

user202729 opened this issue Dec 9, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@user202729
Copy link
Contributor

user202729 commented Dec 9, 2024

not really a bug, but I notice in the tutorial https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/tutorial/interfaces.html it says gp is the "Go PARI" interpreter… but I don't think that's what the name stands for.

There's a historical note https://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/timeline.html where it says PARI stands for "Précision ARbitraire [AR]Ithmihque" (I don't know French but I guess it means "arbitrary precision algorithms"), and gc stands for "Grand Calculateur", later renamed to gp where P stands for "programmable"…

@dimpase
Copy link
Member

dimpase commented Dec 9, 2024

should we just change that string in the following

$ git grep \*\ ARI
src/doc/de/tutorial/interfaces.rst:-  ``gp`` -- Der "**G** o **P** ARI" Interpreter und
src/doc/en/tutorial/interfaces.rst:-  ``gp`` -- the "**G** o **P** ARI" interpreter, and
src/doc/fr/tutorial/interfaces.rst:-  ``gp`` -- l'interpréteur "**G** o **P** ARI", et
src/doc/ja/tutorial/interfaces.rst:-  ``gp`` -- "**G** o **P** ARI" インタープリタ
src/doc/pt/tutorial/interfaces.rst:-  ``gp`` -- o "**G** do **P** ARI" interpretador, e
src/doc/ru/tutorial/interfaces.rst:-  ``gp`` -- gp - интерпретатор "**G** o **P** ARI" , и

to something like **G**reat **P**rogrammable ARIthmetic calculator (Great Programmable ARIthmetic calculator) ?

@user202729
Copy link
Contributor Author

the P in PARI supposedly stand for "precision" instead of "programmable" so… maybe it's best to not make up random backronyms.

@dimpase
Copy link
Member

dimpase commented Dec 9, 2024

OK, let it be Precision

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants