Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow addFieldDependency() for displayLogic to include the field itself as a dependency #560

Open
xkrdudrlf opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #561
Open

Allow addFieldDependency() for displayLogic to include the field itself as a dependency #560

xkrdudrlf opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #561
Labels
Status: Fix Proposed A issue that has a PR related to it that provides a possible resolution Type:Missing Feature Feature in a previous version, not in the current

Comments

@xkrdudrlf
Copy link

xkrdudrlf commented Oct 28, 2024

Feature

Enable an user to configure displayLogic of a field using the field itself as a FieldDependency

Context

Currently, a user cannot change a display type of a field based on a value of the field itself.

For example, if a user wants to hide 'title' field when a value of 'title' field is 'n/a', the user should be able to do that by adding the field itself as a dependency under displayLogic configuration.

@xkrdudrlf xkrdudrlf added the Type:Missing Feature Feature in a previous version, not in the current label Oct 28, 2024
xkrdudrlf added a commit to xkrdudrlf/SuiteCRM-Core that referenced this issue Oct 28, 2024
…me in return condition of addFieldDepedency() to allow addition of the field itself as a dependency
@johnM2401 johnM2401 added the Status: Fix Proposed A issue that has a PR related to it that provides a possible resolution label Oct 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Fix Proposed A issue that has a PR related to it that provides a possible resolution Type:Missing Feature Feature in a previous version, not in the current
Projects
None yet
2 participants