Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow for signed URI support in design of new interfaces #31

Open
magicDGS opened this issue Oct 27, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Allow for signed URI support in design of new interfaces #31

magicDGS opened this issue Oct 27, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@magicDGS
Copy link
Member

magicDGS commented Oct 27, 2018

@droazen:

The main requirement is that the APIs need to allow you to optionally pass in URIs/Paths for all of the "companion files" for a particular input. For example, the fai and dict files for a fasta, or the bai file for a bam. When using signed URIs for authentication, these would all have separate signed URIs that would need to be provided explicitly.
Of course, there should also be API methods that don't require you to pass in all of the companion files, and instead infer them automatically from the Path to the primary input, as htsjdk currently does. We would use these whenever possible (eg., when using account-level authentication rather than signed URIs, or when no authentication is necessary).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant