Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: perfect opus merging without 'click' #57

Open
gitoss opened this issue Oct 24, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Feature Request: perfect opus merging without 'click' #57

gitoss opened this issue Oct 24, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@gitoss
Copy link

gitoss commented Oct 24, 2023

Your list for upcoming features contains "merge multiple smaller audio files into large ones auto generating chapters using silence detection with ffmpeg, fdkaac and CliWrap"

I like what tone is aspiring to become, so here's a feature request: I've never managed to merge opus files perfectly without a "click" sounds in the gaps - and I've tried just about every method/tool.

It seems to be some built-in opus problem, either the pre-gap, or simply that opus start/end frames arent't meant to be chained. For mp3, mp3binder manages to do it - but the mp3 format seems to be easier to handle.

I've written a question in Hydrogenaudio, basically to find out that I have to merge before converting to opus - all other methods (yet) fail and produce the "click" gap sound. https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,124084.0.html

@sandreas
Copy link
Owner

I like what tone is aspiring to become, so here's a feature request: I've never managed to merge opus files perfectly without a "click" sounds in the gaps - and I've tried just about every method/tool.

Since I've no time to add features atm, it is a nice request but I think it is not gonna happen soon. However, I thing merging ogg directly may be problematic because of the file format. Probably converting to wav, merging uncompressed and then back to ogg is the way to go. It's slower, but probably more accurate.

This could be a way when a flag extra-accurate is provided or something :-)

@sandreas sandreas added awaiting feedback Requested user feedback needed to continue atldotnet To be discussed with atldotnet maintainer enhancement New feature or request and removed awaiting feedback Requested user feedback needed to continue atldotnet To be discussed with atldotnet maintainer labels Nov 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants