We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
See #162 ...
For Spark SHARK, we will need a good grid over risky expectations. These will only come into play when the expectations regime is STRANGE.
One way we could do this is set the STRANGE threshold low, and cover the full range -- this should be much like the WHITE SHARK case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is it possible to get a hark-less run and cover that range? then see if hark presence changes the range much.
Sorry, something went wrong.
RiskyAvg range: from 1 to .. (what's implied by the usual dividend) ... maxRiskyAvg.
Get maxRiskyAvg by:
Or:
RiskyStd range: from 0 to ... (the usual dividend $\sigma$) ...
(something similar to set the max).
There are many more clever ways to do the calibration but we probably don't have time to implement them in SPARK.
alanlujan91
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
See #162 ...
For Spark SHARK, we will need a good grid over risky expectations.
These will only come into play when the expectations regime is STRANGE.
One way we could do this is set the STRANGE threshold low, and cover the full range -- this should be much like the WHITE SHARK case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: