Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Post Carnival Final Charges Notification #218

Open
arakla opened this issue May 6, 2016 · 7 comments
Open

Post Carnival Final Charges Notification #218

arakla opened this issue May 6, 2016 · 7 comments

Comments

@arakla
Copy link
Member

arakla commented May 6, 2016

Give an admin a way to send a notification/email to all booth chairs, advisors, and financial admins containing an orgs total charges/fines and total store charges as well as instructions on how to view charge details and dispute charges.

@arakla arakla changed the title Charge Notification Post Carnival Final Charges Notification May 6, 2016
@pkoenig10
Copy link
Member

Why should this be through Binder? What you described is exactly what email does.

@arakla
Copy link
Member Author

arakla commented May 6, 2016

Except that means either someone has to get all the information of binder manually or have a report that does this and then know how to do a mail merge. And even then a mail merge won't send one email per org, but one email per person.

@pkoenig10
Copy link
Member

Oh I see, so we can state in the email what the charges are. Got it.

@ChaseBro
Copy link
Member

ChaseBro commented May 6, 2016

Ideally we could actually just send them an invoice and let them "approve"
it through binder and just send the final totals to SAO with the oracle
strings in a separate file and pull the money from their accounts with
digital signatures. This may require you to add the presidents or treasurer
from each org, but they should already have accounts.

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 9:48 PM Patrick Koenig [email protected]
wrote:

Oh I see, so we can state in the email what the charges are. Got it.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#218 (comment)

@arakla
Copy link
Member Author

arakla commented May 6, 2016

A few different thoughts on this, although I actually would love invoices.

  • When orgs sign the terms and conditions, they also have already approved
    an JEs/transfers
  • Depending on how the year goes, charges may go out late, like this year,
    and we will go ahead and do the transfers and make adjustments as needed at
    the end of 15 days (per Rita, Tiffany may want different things when she is
    handling it next year)
  • Oracle String aren't actually that secure, they are available on the
    university's chart of accounts. Student Activities keeps them secure
    because students aren't the most intelligent when it comes to finances and
    paperwork (as proven time and time again in the office). Which is actually
    why I don't want the students entering their Oracle string.
    -- Really if we save it, non SA orgs need the full string, but SA orgs just
    need their funding source and activity code (a partial string)

This being said, if we could generate invoices the way AB Tech can, that
would be great!
Ideally we could actually just send them an invoice and let them "approve"
it through binder and just send the final totals to SAO with the oracle
strings in a separate file and pull the money from their accounts with
digital signatures. This may require you to add the presidents or treasurer
from each org, but they should already have accounts.

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 9:48 PM Patrick Koenig [email protected]
wrote:

Oh I see, so we can state in the email what the charges are. Got it.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#218 (comment)


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#218 (comment)

@arakla
Copy link
Member Author

arakla commented Apr 9, 2017

@sclark Since I can't re-open the issue, if this isn't covered by another one, can you please re-open it?

@sclark
Copy link
Member

sclark commented Apr 9, 2017

@arakla Sure thing. I don't think this is covered, so I'll re-open it.

@sclark sclark reopened this Apr 9, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants