Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: initialize pending block with an empty block #1052

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 20, 2024

Conversation

omerfirmak
Copy link

1. Purpose or design rationale of this PR

...

2. PR title

Your PR title must follow conventional commits (as we are doing squash merge for each PR), so it must start with one of the following types:

  • build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: yarn, eslint, typescript)
  • ci: Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts (example scopes: vercel, github, cypress)
  • docs: Documentation-only changes
  • feat: A new feature
  • fix: A bug fix
  • perf: A code change that improves performance
  • refactor: A code change that doesn't fix a bug, or add a feature, or improves performance
  • style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc)
  • test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests

3. Deployment tag versioning

Has the version in params/version.go been updated?

  • This PR doesn't involve a new deployment, git tag, docker image tag, and it doesn't affect traces
  • Yes

4. Breaking change label

Does this PR have the breaking-change label?

  • This PR is not a breaking change
  • Yes

colinlyguo
colinlyguo previously approved these changes Sep 20, 2024
@omerfirmak omerfirmak merged commit 7ff93ca into develop Sep 20, 2024
8 checks passed
@omerfirmak omerfirmak deleted the omerfirmak/empty-pending branch September 20, 2024 14:19
@0xmountaintop 0xmountaintop mentioned this pull request Oct 10, 2024
5 tasks
0xmountaintop added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2024
* refactor: eliminate double re-execution in AsyncChecker (#1036)

* fix: make reorg mode explicit (#1049)

* fix: avoid committing empty blocks after the deadline (#1051)

* fix: initialize pending block with an empty block (#1052)

* fix: reuse timestamp for blocks failing CCC (#1031)

we assume that same height wont trigger multiple reorgs to be able
to put an upper bound on the reorg depth. We rely on the fact that
AsyncChecker executes transactions one-by-one and tells worker the
safe set of transactions to include in the replacement block that
wont trigger another error on the same block. If worker changes the
timestamp and that causes significant changes to the execution flow
of included transactions; we might have a height where multiple
reorgs happen.

---------

Co-authored-by: Ömer Faruk Irmak <[email protected]>
lwedge99 pushed a commit to sentioxyz/scroll-geth that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants