Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Scylla Operator to https://operatorhub.io/ #43

Open
tzach opened this issue Nov 26, 2019 · 7 comments
Open

Add Scylla Operator to https://operatorhub.io/ #43

tzach opened this issue Nov 26, 2019 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.

Comments

@tzach
Copy link
Contributor

tzach commented Nov 26, 2019

https://operatorhub.io/ holds many open-source operators for user to use.
It will be useful to add Scylla to this list once it is ready

A next step can be to certify the operator
https://connect.redhat.com/explore/red-hat-openshift-operator-certification

@tzach tzach added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Nov 26, 2019
@dyasny
Copy link

dyasny commented Nov 26, 2019

I don't think it was ever tested with openshift, openshift is based on k8s, but it also has some differences

@dahankzter
Copy link
Contributor

Operatorhub seems "standard" so that we should do. As for Openshift I think we can count on the internals being kubernetes compatible or it would break so many functional operators and charts which would make Openshift dead in the water. It needs testing of course like @dyasny suggested and some tweaks here and there I am sure.

@dyasny
Copy link

dyasny commented Nov 27, 2019

@dahankzter openshift defaults to specific networkig configs we might not have tested (weave/flanel instead of calico for example) and it typically uses CRI-O instead of docker, and that's just the tip of the iceberg there :)

@dahankzter dahankzter added this to the 1.0 milestone Jan 29, 2020
@dahankzter
Copy link
Contributor

This is out of scope for 1.0 at least I think @tzach since it seems to be very Openshift oriented.

@dahankzter dahankzter removed this from the 1.0 milestone Feb 17, 2020
@dahankzter dahankzter added this to the 1.0 milestone May 5, 2020
@ezbz ezbz modified the milestones: 1.0, 1.x Feb 23, 2021
@tnozicka tnozicka removed this from the v1.x milestone May 27, 2021
@tnozicka tnozicka added this to the v1.4 milestone Jun 24, 2021
@tnozicka tnozicka added the priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. label Jun 24, 2021
@zimnx zimnx assigned zimnx and unassigned zimnx Jun 28, 2021
@tnozicka tnozicka modified the milestones: v1.4, v1.5 Jul 8, 2021
@tnozicka tnozicka self-assigned this Aug 2, 2021
@tnozicka tnozicka modified the milestones: v1.5, v1.6 Sep 9, 2021
@tnozicka tnozicka modified the milestones: v1.6, v1.7 Nov 26, 2021
@mykaul
Copy link
Contributor

mykaul commented Mar 14, 2023

Depends on #424

@tnozicka tnozicka removed this from the v1.7 milestone Aug 17, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

The Scylla Operator project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 30d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out

/lifecycle stale

@scylla-operator-bot scylla-operator-bot bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 26, 2024
@tnozicka
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-lifecycle stale
/triage accepted

@scylla-operator-bot scylla-operator-bot bot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 26, 2024
@scylla-operator-bot scylla-operator-bot bot added the triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. label Jun 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants