Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Search field for subscriptions and VMs #2

Open
JClarke90 opened this issue Sep 18, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Feature Request: Search field for subscriptions and VMs #2

JClarke90 opened this issue Sep 18, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@JClarke90
Copy link

Hey, I wondered if it would be possible to add a test search field for subscriptions and maybe VMs too, so that it works better at scale? Alternatively the ability to display the VMs across all subscriptions (This one might not be possible).

@sg3-141-592 sg3-141-592 added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 18, 2023
@sg3-141-592
Copy link
Owner

Sure, happy to look at each of the options. I think "display all" as you describe is probably the most user friendly and direct solution.

We've still got a few things to do in the background to make this all a bit more robust on the VM listing like implementing support for paginated results on VM lists (if you've got more than 50 VMs you'll be missing results). And I need to look at something like async calling to get the VM data and streaming the results back to get the performance up to a good level.

@JClarke90
Copy link
Author

JClarke90 commented Sep 18, 2023

That would be great, I’d prefer listing all the VMs, Microsoft convinced us splitting out to many subscriptions is a good idea. Now here we are with 30+ subscriptions which makes automation more challenging.

But I get there would likely be a performance hit from cycling through all of the subs to get the VMs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants