Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Replace adhoc option parsing with use of library(option) #13

Closed
shonfeder opened this issue May 4, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #39
Closed

Replace adhoc option parsing with use of library(option) #13

shonfeder opened this issue May 4, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #39

Comments

@shonfeder
Copy link
Owner

Use library(option) for processing the option lists.

This is mainly for the sake of regularity and standards compliance.

Should be proceeded by an evaluation of currant usage of the options to ensure that library(option) would be a suitable replacement.
@shonfeder
Copy link
Owner Author

Will be affected by how we deal with #24, so holding off on this until that's settled.

@shonfeder shonfeder mentioned this issue Jun 21, 2019
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Use conventional option processing shonfeder/tokenize
1 participant
@shonfeder