You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The CRC16 calculation options are insufficient and hard to understand:
There is no explicit option to control the initial value. There is an implicit way to control it by selecting the named option -CCITT or -XMODEM and then override the polynomial with -POLY.
The implementation comments in crc16.cc refer to the CRC16 algorithm descriptions as proposed in the famous painless giude to CRC: Name, Width, Poly, Init, RefIn, RefOut, XOrOut, Check. But apparently, you can't control all of them, and/or the naming is inconsistent.
In fact, it seems you can't find a combination that creates MODBUS-style CRCs. I tried all 12 combinations of the Parameters {-CCITT|-XMODEM|-BROKEN}, {-AUGment|-No-AUGment}, {-Most_To_Least|-Least_To_Most} with -POLY ibm as indicated in srec_input.1.html, but none of the combinations got the correct result.
Proposal: Add options that control the parameters as named in the painless guide.
The CRC16 calculation options are insufficient and hard to understand:
Proposal: Add options that control the parameters as named in the painless guide.
Useful resources:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: