You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Often what I want to do is I run a command, find it's unreliable, and then run it again with autoclave.
It would be nice if I could do this by just pressing up and putting autoclave at the beginning of the line, but if the command I'm running is FOO=bar ./do-stuff I have to instead write FOO=bar autoclave ./do-stuff. It would be convenient if I could write this as autoclave FOO=bar ./do-stuff.
(I'm aware this is a very petty feature request. You should feel free to ignore it as too high a developer : user effort ratio)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That seems like a good idea. I occasionally rely on make doing something similar.
There shouldn't be any ambiguity between environment variable bindings and other command line options, and any other ambiguities (running a program with = in the name, I guess?) shouldn't be surprising. The implementation should be straightforward. I'll probably add it in the next version.
Often what I want to do is I run a command, find it's unreliable, and then run it again with autoclave.
It would be nice if I could do this by just pressing up and putting
autoclave
at the beginning of the line, but if the command I'm running isFOO=bar ./do-stuff
I have to instead writeFOO=bar autoclave ./do-stuff
. It would be convenient if I could write this asautoclave FOO=bar ./do-stuff
.(I'm aware this is a very petty feature request. You should feel free to ignore it as too high a developer : user effort ratio)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: