You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Documentation of submap is misleading. If cdelt has negative elements (and it probably should), then the recommended positions of "ra_min" and "ra_max" will cause the wcs of the output map to have all positive cdelt (which, as readers of my ellipses will not be surprised to learn, I think it should not).
The docstring is a little more clear, using "xfrom" and "xto" instead of min and max.
To avoid confusion it might be helpful if submap had a noflip argument, like subinds does.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
My bad; agreed that "from" and "to" is better, along with possibly adding a note on the negative cdelt convention.
I leave it to you and @amaurea re: adding noflip. I support it.
Documentation of submap is misleading. If cdelt has negative elements (and it probably should), then the recommended positions of "ra_min" and "ra_max" will cause the wcs of the output map to have all positive cdelt (which, as readers of my ellipses will not be surprised to learn, I think it should not).
The docstring is a little more clear, using "xfrom" and "xto" instead of min and max.
To avoid confusion it might be helpful if submap had a noflip argument, like subinds does.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: