Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Semantic Tables #267

Open
pablo-de-andres opened this issue Jun 22, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Semantic Tables #267

pablo-de-andres opened this issue Jun 22, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels
🏗️ software architecture 🌱 new feature Solving the issue involves the incorporation of a new feature.

Comments

@pablo-de-andres
Copy link
Member

In GitLab by @yoavnash on Mar 10, 2020, 10:35

Instead of keep writing scripts that translate tables to CUDS objects, how about we expose to the user tables that already encode the semantic information? This can also be used to create online tables similar to Google Sheets.

Related to #235

Relevant links:

@pablo-de-andres pablo-de-andres added 🌱 new feature Solving the issue involves the incorporation of a new feature. 🏗️ software architecture labels Jun 22, 2020
@pablo-de-andres
Copy link
Member Author

In GitLab by @yoavnash on Mar 10, 2020, 10:54

changed the description

@pablo-de-andres
Copy link
Member Author

In GitLab by @urbanmatthias on Mar 11, 2020, 09:26

Both RML and R2RML are mainly for conversion data from some source (SQL, CSV, etc) to RDF.
They do not offer the inverse.

To transform RDF to tables, SPARQL queries could be used.

@pablo-de-andres
Copy link
Member Author

In GitLab by @urbanmatthias on Mar 17, 2020, 17:34

http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/virtuososponger/

@pablo-de-andres
Copy link
Member Author

In GitLab by @urbanmatthias on Apr 3, 2020, 08:45

We should also offer a CSV export for the tables

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🏗️ software architecture 🌱 new feature Solving the issue involves the incorporation of a new feature.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant