Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

heroku gem is deprecated. Switch to heroku-api. #9

Open
sbleon opened this issue Oct 26, 2012 · 4 comments
Open

heroku gem is deprecated. Switch to heroku-api. #9

sbleon opened this issue Oct 26, 2012 · 4 comments

Comments

@sbleon
Copy link
Member

sbleon commented Oct 26, 2012

http://blog.heroku.com/archives/2012/10/15/upgrading-to-the-heroku-toolbelt/

@readeharris
Copy link
Contributor

How do we check if the toolbelt is installed for the Heroku rake task?

@Rodel30
Copy link
Member

Rodel30 commented Oct 30, 2012

We can use the heroku-api gem (per issue title). It isn't suggested for developers, but if you need a gem to package with something, then that's the one to use.

@jaredbeck
Copy link

This dependency prevents using a modern version of e.g. fog

bundle update fog
Bundler could not find compatible versions for gem "excon":
  In Gemfile:
    secretive (>= 0) ruby depends on
      heroku (~> 2.0) ruby depends on
        heroku-api (~> 0.2.1) ruby depends on
          excon (~> 0.13.3) ruby

    fog (= 1.32.0) ruby depends on
      fog-core (~> 1.32) ruby depends on
        excon (~> 0.45) ruby

@sbleon
Copy link
Member Author

sbleon commented Jul 8, 2015

I'd rather replace secretive with dotenv than work on secretive.

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Jared Beck [email protected] wrote:

This dependency prevents using a modern version of e.g. fog

bundle update fog
Bundler could not find compatible versions for gem "excon":
In Gemfile:
secretive (>= 0) ruby depends on
heroku (> 2.0) ruby depends on
heroku-api (
> 0.2.1) ruby depends on
excon (~> 0.13.3) ruby

fog (= 1.32.0) ruby depends on
  fog-core (~> 1.32) ruby depends on
    excon (~> 0.45) ruby


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#9 (comment)
.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants