Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Build Test to validate behavior with pre-existing hooks #431

Open
JordoHeffernan opened this issue Feb 13, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Build Test to validate behavior with pre-existing hooks #431

JordoHeffernan opened this issue Feb 13, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@bobm-slalom
Labels
Refactor Code that needs revision/refactoring testing Bulk of this work is writing or updating unit/smoke tests

Comments

@JordoHeffernan
Copy link
Contributor

Add smoke test to confirm expected behavior when securli is added to a repo that has pre-existing pre-commit hooks to confirm we do not overwrite any existing hooks.
@JordoHeffernan JordoHeffernan converted this from a draft issue Feb 13, 2024
@JordoHeffernan JordoHeffernan added the testing Bulk of this work is writing or updating unit/smoke tests label Feb 13, 2024
@blonienc blonienc added the Refactor Code that needs revision/refactoring label Feb 20, 2024
@bobm-slalom bobm-slalom self-assigned this Feb 27, 2024
@bobm-slalom bobm-slalom moved this from Todo to In Progress in seCureLI Feb 27, 2024
@JordoHeffernan JordoHeffernan moved this from In Progress to PR Review in seCureLI Mar 18, 2024
@JordoHeffernan JordoHeffernan moved this from PR Review to Done in seCureLI Mar 18, 2024
@JordoHeffernan
Copy link
Contributor Author

I moved this to done, since the story it was dependent on got wrapped up.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@bobm-slalom bobm-slalom

Labels
Refactor Code that needs revision/refactoring testing Bulk of this work is writing or updating unit/smoke tests
Projects
seCureLI
Status: Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@JordoHeffernan @bobm-slalom @blonienc