You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Description Resource Path Location Type
Duplicating managed version 1.7.2 for slf4j-jdk14 pom.xml /dotify-formatter line 119 Maven pom Loading Problem
This is not an issue of course, one can ignore this warning. But it brings up the question if we need specific versions of plugins that are either the same as what it found anyway, or that are older without a comment describing why the newer version doesn't work. Can we rely on the 'managed' aspect and let the build system figure it out, e.g. as I've done in the ascii_table branch? The fewer things to keep track of, the better.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This particular case (slf4j-jdk14) isn't a plugin but a test dependency. But anyway, regardless of what type of dependency but especially for build-time dependencies (which includes plugins and test dependencies), it is important that they are unambiguously defined in order to have deterministic builds. Sometimes it is possible to remove some version declarations because a parent already defines it and that inherited version is fine (what you did in 4833336 for example). But sometimes a version needs to be overridden because the managed version is wrong. slf4j-jdk14 is an example of that I believe.
I haven’t had any issues thus far (which doesn’t say much), but please add stuff back that shouldn’t have been removed. I’m taking the dumb approach of trusting my IDE, so this will definitely not strip every version declaration.
Eclipse gives me a lot of these warnings:
This is not an issue of course, one can ignore this warning. But it brings up the question if we need specific versions of plugins that are either the same as what it found anyway, or that are older without a comment describing why the newer version doesn't work. Can we rely on the 'managed' aspect and let the build system figure it out, e.g. as I've done in the ascii_table branch? The fewer things to keep track of, the better.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: