Rename main module from tensorflow.rb to tensorflow, keep class-name as Tensorflow (lowercase f)

[zverok]

I believe it should be TensorFlow (with corresponding gem change to tensor_flow). Current version is not looking too reasonable.

[geoffreylitt]

I would agree with changing capitalization to TensorFlow. That's how it's written on the website, so I think that's least surprising to a new developer trying to remember usage.

However, given that the Python module is called tensorflow, I would personally support keeping the gem name like that. I also think tensorflow is more attractive than tensor_flow.

[zverok]

@geoffreylitt In fact, nobody will punish us for any solution, but in Ruby there is pretty strong agreement to have correspondence between gem name, main file name, and main gem namespace, so it is expected to either be gem tensorflow/require 'tensorflow'/module Tensorflow or gem tensor_flow, require 'tensor_flow/module TensorFlow.

[chrhansen]

If you ask me I'd also prefer the most simple, lowercase one word, tensorflow, and loose the .rb ending. Also, in general, I think we should stay as close to the naming and API of the python module as possible, unless it conflicts with Ruby conventions.

I would prefer to see module TensorFlow (T and F capitalized), but would rather stick with require 'tensorflow' and module Tensorflow to follow ruby conventions.

[zverok]

OK, then let's make the most reasonable thing: tensorflow gem name/main file name and TensorFlow module name. I agree all other options are quite ugly.

[nethsix]

I prefer tensorflow, just to be consistent with the python module, and Tensorflow just to be consisten with tensorflow (otherwise there may be confusion).

[jtoy]

agree tensorflow is best