Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Allow P2 > 1.8 for OR's and P2 > 2.8 for ER's in final review #369

Open
taldcroft opened this issue Mar 16, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Allow P2 > 1.8 for OR's and P2 > 2.8 for ER's in final review #369

taldcroft opened this issue Mar 16, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees
@jeanconn
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@taldcroft
Copy link
Member

See the like-named section in https://occweb.cfa.harvard.edu/twiki/bin/view/Aspect/StarWorkingGroupMeeting2021x01x27.

This new policy should be reflected in the starcheck output somehow.
@jeanconn
Copy link
Contributor

Since we left the "if it was > 2 or > 3 in prelim" I think this just ends up being a comment if you think we need it.

@taldcroft
Copy link
Member Author

After 6 months I will have forgotten about this policy, so yes it does need to be written.

@jeanconn jeanconn self-assigned this Mar 17, 2021
@jeanconn
Copy link
Contributor

Might be useful to come up with a similar threshold for the guide star metric and at what level we think creep-away is a good idea.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jeanconn jeanconn

Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@taldcroft @jeanconn