You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In Resolver DID Document Format section of the specification, it refers to DIDComm V2 endpoint entries in endpoint ATTRIB as those whose type is DIDComm, and also states to render a service object in the resulting DID Document using that type.
However, according to DIDComm Messaging v2.0 specification, service endpoint type must be DIDCommMessaging. This would prevent DIDComm V2 Agents to properly DIDComm V2 messaging services in a DID Document resolved by a did:sov resolver following this spec.
Another inconsistency between this spec and DIDComm Messaging v2.x is the service block mentioned as example:
Finally, related to this is that the spec states that https://didcomm.org/messaging/contexts/v2 must be added to @context array and it is currently returning 404. That's maybe an issue on didcomm.org side (decentralized-identity/didcomm.org#70).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In Resolver DID Document Format section of the specification, it refers to DIDComm V2 endpoint entries in endpoint ATTRIB as those whose type is
DIDComm
, and also states to render a service object in the resulting DID Document using that type.However, according to DIDComm Messaging v2.0 specification, service endpoint type must be
DIDCommMessaging
. This would prevent DIDComm V2 Agents to properly DIDComm V2 messaging services in a DID Document resolved by a did:sov resolver following this spec.Another inconsistency between this spec and DIDComm Messaging v2.x is the service block mentioned as example:
Is not compliant, as serviceEndpoint should be a list of objects. So the resulting service block should be:
Finally, related to this is that the spec states that
https://didcomm.org/messaging/contexts/v2
must be added to@context
array and it is currently returning 404. That's maybe an issue on didcomm.org side (decentralized-identity/didcomm.org#70).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: