You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Just pointing out that if the rebuild job can never get scheduled onto a pod, as in the jobs you linked above, then we definitely don't report anything to the broken specs list, as none of our rebuild script logic ever gets to run. In the case of the broken mpich/oxqu5m7, it appears to have been recorded on the broken specs list here: https://gitlab.spack.io/spack/spack/-/jobs/3333864. Then the other retries were already used up, or had previously failed and this was the third one.
Feel free to change the title of the spec to make it more precise. What I did to track this down was:
Get a list of the pipelines on develop
Look one by one at the failed pipelines to see when the failure was happening
Check "failed jobs" as in the screenshot
Do I understand correctly then that "Failed jobs" might not be the job that caused the spec to be marked as "broken", but I may need to look further down in the right column, like:
Yes, by looking down that list at the other failures of the same hash, I found the one that actually got scheduled, ran, and the build failed (and said it was going to report the breakage).
Inspecting the list of pipelines run on develop there is a system failure when building
mpich
occurring here:The pipeline running after the one above fails, reporting the two
mpich
as broken specs:spack/spack#32839 swaps two lines of code to trigger a rebuild of
mpich
, which results in the following jobs for theaws-isc
pipeline:where
mpich
builds fine. That seems to suggest that a system failure was recorded as a broken spec.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: