Make R2RC award process more participatory & showcase more people

[JosephMcArthur]

No description provided.

[char-siuu-bao]

Also publicize what the criteria for choosing the award winner is? Part of me wonders if it's a little bit echo-chamber-y from what you described (you choose someone who's done impactful work, but that works needs to be supported by R2RC in some way), which means the award is always going to be going toward someone we've already been supporting ... if that makes sense.

[JosephMcArthur]

I've put together some suggested guidelines & processes for this year (with room for improvement next year): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CBOIxhrBbKw3QFcELdMuzlACHnu0iNq4oFMpfYTF8IM/edit?usp=sharing

@lorrainechu3n / @nshockey please let me know what you think.

[JosephMcArthur]

@lorrainechu3n would be great to get your thoughts on this next week :)

[JosephMcArthur]

Moving this into the backlog as we're not going to manage it now.

[JosephMcArthur]

Note: I think this makes sense to do as part of the impact survey in May.