Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

3237 better index #47

Merged
merged 59 commits into from
Dec 3, 2024
Merged

3237 better index #47

merged 59 commits into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

Stevesibilia
Copy link
Contributor

@Stevesibilia Stevesibilia commented Dec 2, 2024

PR Type

Enhancement


Description

  • Major refactoring of the outputs structure to improve data organization and secret management:
    • Introduced nested mapping using helm release names as secondary keys
    • Added better handling of null values for helm_release_name and database_name
    • Improved secret name resolution by incorporating helm_release_name consistently
  • Added new output variables for better visibility into secret mappings
  • Enhanced data structure with grouped_resources for better project organization
  • Added conditional creation of bucket_secrets_map based on var.create_buckets
  • Improved error handling with better null checks and default values

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
outputs.tf
Refactor outputs structure for improved secret management

outputs.tf

  • Introduced grouped_resources local variable for better project data
    organization
  • Enhanced secret mapping with improved handling of helm_release_name
  • Added new outputs for bucket_secrets_map, database_secrets_map, and
    database_credentials_map
  • Restructured data structure to use nested maps with helm release names
    as keys
  • +70/-32 

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    …g helm_release_name and providing a default value
    …by incorporating helm_release_name for improved secret identification
    …fore helm_release_name for improved secret identification
    …ate output to directly reference sql_users_creds
    …or drupal_apps_all_data for improved data representation
    …ed_resources for improved data representation
    …o use grouped_index for improved resource representation
    …s for grouped_resources and enhancing namespace assignment
    …name reference for improved resource identification
    …bucket_secret and kubernetes_database_secret for improved resource access
    …d-out project_info and all_data sections for improved clarity
    …rouped_index and project_info, and add drupal_apps_namespaces output for improved resource organization
    … Drupal projects by replacing commented-out sections with structured outputs for bucket and database credentials and secrets, improving resource indexing and organization.
    …tency, updating all references to include 'all_' prefix for improved resource identification and organization.
    @sparkfabrik-ai-bot
    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 4 🔵🔵🔵🔵⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 Security concerns

    Sensitive Information Exposure:
    While the sensitive outputs are properly marked with sensitive = true, the grouped_resources output (lines 55-57) may expose internal project structure and naming conventions that could be useful for attackers. Consider limiting the exposed information in this output.

    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Null Safety
    The nested try/if conditions for database credentials lookup could fail silently. Need to validate the error handling and default values behavior.

    Performance Concern
    Multiple nested for loops and map transformations may impact performance with large number of projects. Consider optimizing data structure transformations.

    Code Complexity
    The conditional logic for helm_release_name and database_name resolution is complex and spread across multiple places. Consider extracting common logic into helper functions.

    @sparkfabrik-ai-bot
    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible bug
    Add safety check before accessing first element of a potentially empty list to prevent runtime errors

    Add error handling for the case when no matching database credentials are found in
    the list comprehension. Currently, accessing index [0] could fail if the list is
    empty.

    outputs.tf [12-17]

    -[for cred in module.drupal_databases_and_users[0].sql_users_creds : cred
    +length([for cred in module.drupal_databases_and_users[0].sql_users_creds : cred
       if cred.database == (
         r.database_name != null ?
         r.database_name :
         replace("${r.project_name}_${r.gitlab_project_id}_${r.release_branch_name}_dp", "-", "_")
    -)][0]
    +)]) > 0 ? [for cred in module.drupal_databases_and_users[0].sql_users_creds : cred
    +  if cred.database == (
    +    r.database_name != null ?
    +    r.database_name :
    +    replace("${r.project_name}_${r.gitlab_project_id}_${r.release_branch_name}_dp", "-", "_")
    +)][0] : null
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: The suggestion addresses a critical potential runtime error by adding a safety check before accessing the first element of a filtered list, which could be empty. This is an important defensive programming practice.

    8
    Possible issue
    Add validation to prevent creation of map entries with null key components

    Consider adding validation for empty or null values in the grouped_resources map to
    prevent potential issues with downstream dependencies.

    outputs.tf [2-3]

     grouped_resources = {
    -  for p in var.drupal_projects_list : "${p.project_name}-${p.gitlab_project_id}-${p.release_branch_name}" => p...
    +  for p in var.drupal_projects_list : "${p.project_name}-${p.gitlab_project_id}-${p.release_branch_name}" => p... if p.project_name != null && p.gitlab_project_id != null && p.release_branch_name != null
     }
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: The suggestion adds important input validation to prevent potential issues with null values in key components, which could cause problems in downstream resources or make debugging difficult.

    6
    Maintainability
    Extract repeated complex string manipulation into a named local variable for better maintainability

    Consider extracting the complex database name generation logic into a local variable
    to improve readability and reduce code duplication.

    outputs.tf [16]

    -replace("${r.project_name}_${r.gitlab_project_id}_${r.release_branch_name}_dp", "-", "_")
    +local.generated_database_name
    +# Add at top of locals block:
    +# generated_database_name = replace("${r.project_name}_${r.gitlab_project_id}_${r.release_branch_name}_dp", "-", "_")
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 3

    Why: While the suggestion would improve code maintainability by reducing duplication, the current implementation is already clear and the extraction would add complexity by introducing another variable.

    3

    … replacing string interpolation with direct variable usage for enhanced readability and maintainability.
    …upal_apps_all_data output to support multiple deployments within the same project context.
    Copy link
    Member

    @andypanix andypanix left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Just a note, it would have been better to avoid repeating the logic for generating the names of the various resources in the output, but if it makes the task much longer/complicated, for me the actual code is good enough and we can merge the PR as is.

    Maybe we can consider the feature a nice to have for a refactoring in the future.

    @Stevesibilia Stevesibilia merged commit 51fd389 into main Dec 3, 2024
    1 check passed
    @Stevesibilia Stevesibilia deleted the 3237_better_index branch December 3, 2024 10:38
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants