You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Unrolling a stencil in 2 or even 3 dimensions (+ inlining) might have performance benefits over unrolling into one dimension (+ inlining).
Example in 2D:
Assume for every grid point (i,j) the Laplacians for the 9 surrounding gridpoints have to be calculated (i-1) to (i+1) and (j-1) to (j+1).
We now compare no unrolling to unrolling in one direction by 4 to unrolling in 2 dimensions by 2. We always look at how many Laplacians have to be calculated for 4 grid points.
No Unrolling: 4*9 = 36
Unrolling in one dimension by 4: 9 + 3*3 = 18
Unrolling in two dimensions by 2: 9 + 3 + 4 = 16
Here the unrolling in two dimensions seems to be the best choice for performance
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Unrolling a stencil in 2 or even 3 dimensions (+ inlining) might have performance benefits over unrolling into one dimension (+ inlining).
Example in 2D:
Here the unrolling in two dimensions seems to be the best choice for performance
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: