You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi! Is Voyager intended to handle missing values in some way? It might be useful to allow missing values in the query vector, in which case I think the search should consider other elements only. Would that be possible given the data structure you have, even if those queries would be less efficient?
I'm trying out the Python package and if I set an element in the query vector to numpy.nan, it seems to propagate so that all distances are NaN as well and the results don't seem meaningful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello. Voyager doesn't handle missing values and we don't have any plans to at the moment. I agree, Voyager returning NaN distances when missing values are present isn't very useful. Perhaps we can throw an error when missing values are present to be clearer about the nonsupport.
Hi! Is Voyager intended to handle missing values in some way? It might be useful to allow missing values in the query vector, in which case I think the search should consider other elements only. Would that be possible given the data structure you have, even if those queries would be less efficient?
I'm trying out the Python package and if I set an element in the query vector to
numpy.nan
, it seems to propagate so that all distances are NaN as well and the results don't seem meaningful.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: