Make child html reader tag optional?

[borkdude]

In many cases it would be nice to not have to write the child html reader tag:

      #html ^lit/html
                   [:div {:class "bg-red-200"} (when true [:em "hello"]))]

However, there might be cases where a child vector is intended as a JS runtime array and not HTML:

      #html ^lit/html
                   [:div {:class "bg-red-200"} (pr-str [:em "hello"])]

This may be a reason to always make child tags explicit, however the 99% use case is probably the opposite. Maybe an explicit way to opt out of propagating could also work.

[zampino]

Or as a third case, have a different reader tag #html* that propagates (with the same ^tag) to child forms?

[zampino]

as for

      #html ^lit/html
                   [:div {:class "bg-red-200"} (pr-str [:em "hello"])]

we could always use vec to build an actual js array

[zampino]

+1 for the opposite :-)

however the 99% use case is probably the opposite