-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document add custom colormap to Geo2Grid IR channel #647
Comments
From the gitlab geosphere issue related to this and adopting a custom configuration only in geosphere: @graemely's question:
My response:
|
Yes, there would be a C??_color for every IR channel, but I was thinking it would only be listed in |
Hhhmm I think they'd be considered and listed as "custom user products" if they aren't considered "supported G2G products" and that's with the plain For keeping the list short: user confusion is probably the biggest one. |
"Custom user products" sounds to me like something the user created. But regardless, I would argue we should plan to continue adding products that we think will have value for users and that have been vetted in some way. Maybe it should be a requirement that there is some documentation that we can link users to. |
Oh I wasn't saying the custom user products was a good thing. I just meant (without saying) that there isn't a way to add these so that they show up only in the "all" list. What documentation do you mean? Like a NOAA/NASA guide about a product? |
Yes, something like a NOAA/NASA guide, or a paper. Even a set of slides would be better than nothing. We can host those kinds of things on the CSPP Geo website if needed. |
That might be hard for the colorized IR images as those are "it's what AWIPS does" and in some cases it sounds like TimS would prefer if we didn't follow the AWIPS default as he "lost the battle" on what colormap to be the default. I think a lot of them come down "oh this looks prettier than that one". |
My own criteria may be close to "oh this looks prettier than that one", but I'm confident Tim has a good sciency reason for his preferences. As has been noted we can't make everyone happy, so I think the best we can do is gather input and make an informed decision. Suggest asking him why he prefers that flavor, and what documentation exists. |
I think documenting and closing this issue would also qualify #286 for closing. |
In an effort to not make users upset, we don't want to change the default enhancement for all IR channels by adding colormaps. Instead, we plan on documenting how to add a custom colormap via a custom enhancement configuration in the PDF documentation and website. This could/should include mentioning replacing/overwriting the existing enhancement (meaning "C07" is still called "C07") and also adding a new "single band" composite that adds this colormapped version under a new name (ex. "C07_color").
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: