Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

An in-range update of eslint-plugin-ember is breaking the build 🚨 #4

Open
greenkeeper bot opened this issue Mar 19, 2019 · 13 comments
Open

An in-range update of eslint-plugin-ember is breaking the build 🚨 #4

greenkeeper bot opened this issue Mar 19, 2019 · 13 comments

Comments

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor

greenkeeper bot commented Mar 19, 2019

The devDependency eslint-plugin-ember was updated from 6.2.0 to 6.3.0.

🚨 View failing branch.

This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build failed.

eslint-plugin-ember is a devDependency of this project. It might not break your production code or affect downstream projects, but probably breaks your build or test tools, which may prevent deploying or publishing.

Status Details
  • continuous-integration/travis-ci/push: The Travis CI build failed (Details).

Release Notes for v6.3.0

🚀 Enhancement

  • #369 Add new 'route-path-style' rule (@bmish)
  • #372 Add new 'no-unnecessary-index-route' rule (@bmish)
  • #262 Add new 'require-return-from-computed' rule (@gmurphey)
  • #378 Add new no-unnecessary-service-injection-argument rule (@bmish)

📝 Documentation

  • #395 docs: improve closure-action rule examples (@Caltor)
  • #383 no-deeply-nested-dependent-keys-with-each: Fix documentation examples (@Alonski)

🏠 Internal

  • #386 test: add null output assertions for lint rules / test cases with no autofixer. (@bmish)

Committers: 4

FAQ and help

There is a collection of frequently asked questions. If those don’t help, you can always ask the humans behind Greenkeeper.


Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented Mar 19, 2019

After pinning to 6.2.0 your tests are still failing. The reported issue might not affect your project. These imprecisions are caused by inconsistent test results.

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented Apr 21, 2019

Your tests are passing again with this update. Explicitly upgrade to this version 🚀

Release Notes for v6.4.0

🚀 Enhancement

🐛 Bug Fix

  • #398 no-unnecessary-route-path-option: fix error when path is undefined (@bmish)

📝 Documentation

Committers: 2

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented Apr 21, 2019

Your tests are passing again with this update. Explicitly upgrade to this version 🚀

Release Notes for v6.4.1

🐛 Bug Fix

  • #413 Ignore template literals in no-get and no-get-properties rules (@bmish)

Committers: 1

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented May 27, 2019

Your tests are passing again with this update. Explicitly upgrade to this version 🚀

Release Notes for v6.5.0

🚀 Enhancement

  • #421 Update the no-get rule to also handle the getProperties function, and mark the no-get-properties rule as deprecated (@bmish)
  • #397 Add new computed-property-getters rule (@jrjohnson)

📝 Documentation

Committers: 2

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented May 27, 2019

Your tests are passing again with this update. Explicitly upgrade to this version 🚀

Release Notes for v6.5.1

🐛 Bug Fix

  • #427 Fix typo in error message for no-get rule (@bmish)

Committers: 1

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented Jun 16, 2019

Your tests are passing again with this update. Explicitly upgrade to this version 🚀

Release Notes for v6.6.0

🚀 Enhancement

  • #429 Add new require-computed-macros rule (@bmish)

🐛 Bug Fix

  • #428 Fix spread operator bug in no-on-calls-in-components rule (@rajasegar)

📝 Documentation

  • #431 Add link to sendAction deprecation RFC for closure-actions rule (@bmish)

Committers: 2

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented Jun 22, 2019

Your tests are passing again with this update. Explicitly upgrade to this version 🚀

Release Notes for Release 6.7.0

v6.7.0 (2019-06-22)

🚀 Enhancement

  • #436 Adds decorator rules to aid migration to Octane (@pzuraq)
  • #434 Add new no-volatile-computed-properties rule (@bmish)

🐛 Bug Fix

  • #432 Update require-computed-macros rule to suggest the reads macro instead of readOnly for computed properties with return this.x (@bmish)

🏠 Internal

Committers: 4

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented Jul 2, 2019

Your tests are passing again with this update. Explicitly upgrade to this version 🚀

Release Notes for v6.7.1

🐛 Bug Fix

  • #440 Add missing rules classic-decorator-hooks and classic-decorator-no-classic-methods to index.js (@bmish)

Committers: 1

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented Aug 9, 2019

Your tests are passing again with this update. Explicitly upgrade to this version 🚀

Release Notes for v6.8.2

🐛 Bug Fix

  • #461 Add null check in new-module-imports rule (again) (@bmish)

Committers: 1

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented Aug 12, 2019

Your tests are passing again with this update. Explicitly upgrade to this version 🚀

Release Notes for v6.9.0

🚀 Enhancement

  • #458 Add new rule require-computed-property-dependencies (@bmish)

🐛 Bug Fix

  • #463 Fix false positives for import statements with use-ember-data-rfc-395-imports rule (@fusion2004)

🏠 Internal

  • #465 Add tests that rules are setup correctly (not missing tests, docs, exports, etc) (@bmish)
  • #466 Fix eslint 6 rule test parser error (@bmish)

Committers: 2

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented Aug 14, 2019

Your tests are passing again with this update. Explicitly upgrade to this version 🚀

Release Notes for v6.9.1

🐛 Bug Fix

  • #472 Improve handling of nested keys inside braces for require-computed-property-dependencies rule (@bmish)
  • #471 Improve detection of missing dependencies in require-computed-property-dependencies rule (@bmish)

Committers: 1

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented Aug 19, 2019

Your tests are still failing with this version. Compare changes

Release Notes for v6.10.0

🚀 Enhancement

  • #473 Add new no-incorrect-calls-with-inline-anonymous-functions rule (@raycohen)

🐛 Bug Fix

  • #476 Add allowDynamicKeys option (default true) to require-computed-property-dependencies rule (@bmish)

Committers: 2

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented Aug 23, 2019

Your tests are passing again with this update. Explicitly upgrade to this version 🚀

Release Notes for v6.10.1

🐛 Bug Fix

  • #488 Update require-computed-property-dependencies rule to support eslint 3 and 4 (@bmish)

📝 Documentation

  • #489 Document eslint 4 as the minimum supported version (@bmish)

🏠 Internal

  • #482 Start testing plugin under Node 12 (@bmish)

Committers: 1

Commits

The new version differs by 15 commits.

  • 362b42b v6.10.1
  • 60e1dce Update CHANGELOG
  • 84b2469 Merge pull request #489 from bmish/eslint-4-minimum-version
  • a2bf4bd Revert "chore(dev-deps): upgrade to eslint 5.16.0"
  • c8e6d0d docs: Document eslint 4 as the minimum supported version
  • 8eb61cf Merge pull request #488 from bmish/require-computed-property-dependencies-eslint4-fix
  • f317d94 fix: update require-computed-property-dependencies rule to work in eslint 3 and eslint 4
  • f2b96cb Merge pull request #483 from bmish/script-lint-js
  • 6a87c5e Merge pull request #482 from bmish/test-node-12
  • bcef6ea Add yarn lint:js script which is called by yarn lint.
  • 29c84ff test: start testing plugin under Node 12
  • 2a5f4d3 Merge pull request #480 from bmish/bmishkin/readme-remove-node-6
  • 40a5bed build(deps-dev): bump jest from 24.8.0 to 24.9.0 (#474)
  • 498b704 build(deps-dev): bump eslint-config-prettier from 6.0.0 to 6.1.0 (#481)
  • 2bc6ca9 docs: update supported Node versions mentioned in README

See the full diff

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants