We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We define the Cholesky-based parameterization, but don't mention that they're more efficient and more numerically stable.
This should go in the functions reference for the Cholesky-based parameterizations (LKJ, Wisharts, and multi-normal).
This arose through an issue on the Stan forums from jachymb, which also describes why the Cholesky parameterizations are better:
https://discourse.mc-stan.org/t/what-is-the-point-of-the-multi-normal-cholesky-parametrization/38483/2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Summary:
We define the Cholesky-based parameterization, but don't mention that they're more efficient and more numerically stable.
Description:
This should go in the functions reference for the Cholesky-based parameterizations (LKJ, Wisharts, and multi-normal).
This arose through an issue on the Stan forums from jachymb, which also describes why the Cholesky parameterizations are better:
https://discourse.mc-stan.org/t/what-is-the-point-of-the-multi-normal-cholesky-parametrization/38483/2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: