Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Brel wood shutters tilt only: position random? #46

Closed
rknotter opened this issue May 6, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Brel wood shutters tilt only: position random? #46

rknotter opened this issue May 6, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@rknotter
Copy link

rknotter commented May 6, 2024

Hi,

I just installed 7 Brel wood shutters, tilt only, with hub. In the app the tilt position (in degrees) is correct, from -90 to 0 (horizontal) to +90. I even finetuned the start/end positions to have a consistent response of all shutters.

I added the Motionblinds integration with (I think) succes. In HASS I can use cover.set_cover_tilt_position, however this seems to be sort of random. For instance: if I set all covers closed (90 degr) in the Brel app and do the following:

service: cover.set_cover_tilt_position
target:
entity_id: cover.zonwering_beneden
data:
tilt_position: 0

the shutters tilt end up at random positions (-36, -34, -14, -31, -18, 0 and 7 degrees). The expected behaviour would be to open completely, being -90 degr in the app. Horizontal would be 50 in HASS and 0 in the app.

Is this a configuration issue? Or is this a bug in the integration perhaps?

Thanks for your time!

@rknotter rknotter closed this as completed May 6, 2024
@rknotter
Copy link
Author

rknotter commented May 6, 2024

I'm sorry, this is the wrong repository.

@rknotter rknotter reopened this May 6, 2024
@starkillerOG
Copy link
Owner

This has been solved in the latest HA release, therefore I will close this issue.

If you are still experiancing this issue, please let me know.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants