-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 542
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cascade method getViewData should only return the data from the current view and not all of it. #10703
Comments
I ignored both above.. If you are interested about what i wanted to do, this is how I got the view param: class Attributes extends Tags
{
/**
* A bit hacky...
*/
private function getViewName()
{
$reflectionProperty = new \ReflectionProperty(RuntimeParser::class, 'view');
$reflectionProperty->setAccessible(true);
return $reflectionProperty->getValue($this->parser);
}
private function getParamsFromCascade()
{
return Arr::get(
Cascade::instance()->get('views', []),
$this->getViewName(),
[]
);
}
/* [...] */
} |
Just to clarify, you're saying that variables from previous "replicator sets" are leaking into the cascade? Are you able to ptovide an example? |
Thanks - I see it now. By the way. you don't need to build a custom tag for debugging, you can just do |
As mentioned in #11178 , if fixing this is not so simple because of retro compatibility issues, it may be possible to add a new "self" (or another name) variable available inside partial, storing only values from that template... ( ie the same than "view" var but without the leaked values.. ) . What do you think? |
I'm not sure because it affected the normal use aswell.. It affect repeated views especially. My solution was like you said, I scoped the bad field with "block", so i can use the "block:var" notation. But this solution doesn't correct the behavior with view level parameters. As for your problem, I don't think it would affect you implementation of "allExperts" (correct me) in the parent view. I don't consider data that was set above the view "leaked", I more refering to data that was set in an equal or further depth on a view :
Your point is valid tho and there is a way to get the data from the template only: If you check my above solution to my problem, I have rigged myself a function to get the view data only. It feels hacky because it is a private property that i forced public, but it works for me.
This function only get the parameter set in the current view, so it works like the "SELF" variable proposed. I still didn't take a look at solution for my problem because i made this temporary solution and sometime temporary become permanent untill it breaks 😅. |
Bug description
I am currently creating a tag which takes all the param from the view and merge them to act like the AttributesBag from blade.
For this, i was using $this->context->view as a reference to the param of the current view. But i soon realized that if i didn't put the param
class
in each of my block using this tag, i would get a leak from a block that used theclass
param.Example:
{{ partial:layout/block_1 class="cool_class" }} {{ partial:layout/block_2}} // if I check $this->contect->view here, it will have the class=>cool_class param
So i went out of my way by using the "view" property from the RuntimeParser to execute the Cascade::instance()->getViewData() method.
It works, but i get the same result.
I checked the method and i feel something is wrong with it. It gets the data from all views each time, and overwrite (merge) the current's view data, which feel unituitive because it's not only the view data, it's ALL the data.
I look through the code and it's not used a lot so maybe it's an oversight.
For the time being, i'll use Cascade::instance()->get('views) and get the array i need.
ButI felt it needed to be revised.
How to reproduce
Logs
No response
Environment
Installation
Fresh statamic/statamic site via CLI
Additional details
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: