You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This configuration uses 'http' port for liveness check for the pulsar-proxy but it uses the 'https' check on 'pulsar-proxy -websocket' I can't find any extra setting CRD to convince 'pulsar-operator-controller' to create the liveness check on http port.
I could not find the code for the 'pulsar-operator-controller' may be there is a configuration parameter for it but I can' figure out.
I am in my test setup and I don't want to fight with the complexity TLS until proof of concept works, so is there a way to configure for Websocket container to use http port?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@mehmetsalgar Hi, after checking this issue, I think the implementation for the Proxy WebSocket is a little weird and different with the Broker WebSocket CR API.
You can try with this config to enable the WebSocket on Proxy and don't try Proxy WebSocket CR API.
Hi,
I am using the following CRD configuration for the PulsarProxy...
This configuration uses 'http' port for liveness check for the pulsar-proxy but it uses the 'https' check on 'pulsar-proxy -websocket' I can't find any extra setting CRD to convince 'pulsar-operator-controller' to create the liveness check on http port.
This is what is created at StatefulSet
I could not find the code for the 'pulsar-operator-controller' may be there is a configuration parameter for it but I can' figure out.
I am in my test setup and I don't want to fight with the complexity TLS until proof of concept works, so is there a way to configure for Websocket container to use http port?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: