Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No bulbs detected #7

Open
Bandit opened this issue Jan 11, 2018 · 14 comments
Open

No bulbs detected #7

Bandit opened this issue Jan 11, 2018 · 14 comments

Comments

@Bandit
Copy link

Bandit commented Jan 11, 2018

I'm on ethernet, while my bulbs are on wifi (same network though) - is that likely the cause?

lifxDynamic and the official Lifx windows app don't have any issues detecting

@stringandstickytape
Copy link
Owner

Not as such, that's the same setup I use.

Possibly wifi isolation is preventing PC -> bulb LAN communication, which (I think) the official Lifx app will work around by using the HTTP API.

Suggest investigating your router and any possible wifi isolation stuff therein. Also try (if you didn't already) the "Advanced Discover" thing. I think it worked for one or two users with the same sorts of problems. You could also try connecting your PC via wifi as a test, if you have a wifi adapter. Also be sure any other Lifx-controlling apps are closed before starting MaxLifx. Let me know how you get on...

@nfsmaster208
Copy link

nfsmaster208 commented Jan 11, 2018 via email

@Bandit
Copy link
Author

Bandit commented Jan 11, 2018

I don't have wifi on my PC unfortunately (it's a custom built desktop). I've checked that wifi isolation isn't enabled (it isn't). I can see other wifi devices on my network such as my Chromecast etc so I don't think it's that.

Is there any way I can enable logging or debug the detection? I'll also try the app on a different computer to see if it's that.

@nfsmaster208
Copy link

nfsmaster208 commented Jan 12, 2018 via email

@AbbieGator
Copy link

AbbieGator commented Jan 17, 2018

So I'm having the same problem. Advanced looks like it does the same as regular.

Found the reason why, it's picking the wrong local IP. Trying to work out how to make it pick the other one. I blame TunnelBear for part of it.

Fix for multiple IP's

// LocalIPAddress from https://github.com/PhilWheat/LIFX-Control
public static string LocalIPAddress()
{
string localIP;
using (Socket socket = new Socket(AddressFamily.InterNetwork, SocketType.Dgram, 0))
{
socket.Connect("8.8.8.8", 65530);
IPEndPoint endPoint = socket.LocalEndPoint as IPEndPoint;
localIP = endPoint.Address.ToString();
}
return localIP;
}

@stringandstickytape
Copy link
Owner

This is added to v0.6. Hopefully working now. Thx Clarkinator! :D

@Bandit
Copy link
Author

Bandit commented Jan 28, 2018

Hey now I can detect a single bulb. I have 5 total. The one it detects is actually my oldest bulb.

Only thing I can think of is the bulb it detects is the only one I left in the 'default' group - I moved all the others.

@nfsmaster208
Copy link

@Bandit Have you tried soft resetting the lamps themselves? I.e. flipping power to the lamp to reset to the standard color and brightness setting? I've seen this happen before and I just needed to reset the lamps so they started communicating normally again. Haven't had to do so in awhile, but it does happen.

@Bandit
Copy link
Author

Bandit commented Jan 31, 2018

Doesn't work. In fact when I tried it today the one bulb it did detect has disappeared 😭

@vascozorrinho
Copy link

maybe if we had an option to add bulbs manually specifying the IP it would be better to discover to them

@RandyHRus
Copy link

Does this program support the LIFX mini? I can't seem to discover my bulb either. I'm on same wifi.

@niXta1
Copy link

niXta1 commented Dec 18, 2018

All mine works fine. mini’s, original, 1000, Z, tile. Did you get them working?
Sometimes I have to turn them off for 10s to make them work. It also happens with other softwares that communicates by lifx lan protocol.

@tchesket
Copy link

nfsmaster208
Do you still have useful info to share regarding a script/wifi-isolation/etc? I think that might be my problem as well.

@tchesket
Copy link

Is it not possible to incorporate the same http api workaround that the official app uses into this one?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants