You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 21, 2024. It is now read-only.
The rs-wnfs project is reaching a level of maturity where we may experimentally implement it as a mechanism to store Noosphere content. We have speculated that it may make a good candidate for #13 , but it also features a "public" file system that may be a suitable substitute for the slug/memo-based content space currently implemented by Noosphere.
I filed wnfs-wg/spec#67 to inquire about UnixFS requirements in WNFS' public filesystem. Putting that aside for a second, it would be interesting to investigate the implications of using a public WNFS filesystem as a substitute for Noosphere's current public content space.
And, of course, it would be interesting to investigate using the private filesystem as a candidate solution to #13.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The
rs-wnfs
project is reaching a level of maturity where we may experimentally implement it as a mechanism to store Noosphere content. We have speculated that it may make a good candidate for #13 , but it also features a "public" file system that may be a suitable substitute for the slug/memo-based content space currently implemented by Noosphere.I filed wnfs-wg/spec#67 to inquire about UnixFS requirements in WNFS' public filesystem. Putting that aside for a second, it would be interesting to investigate the implications of using a public WNFS filesystem as a substitute for Noosphere's current public content space.
And, of course, it would be interesting to investigate using the private filesystem as a candidate solution to #13.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: