You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be nice to allow users to manage models using a web interface as an alternative to managing them via custom resource in the Kubernetes API Server.
This would likely need to be an either/or choice for a given installation to avoid a declarative-imperative conflict.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is the concern that people may override the models from the catalog that are managed by Helm? As a result a subsequent helm apply might revert the changes made through the UI?
One way we could think of is to add label to a model if it's managed by helm. In that case the UI shouldn't allow modifying it. Or show some warning, that their changes will get lost on subsequent helm apply.
It would be nice to allow users to manage models using a web interface as an alternative to managing them via custom resource in the Kubernetes API Server.
This would likely need to be an either/or choice for a given installation to avoid a declarative-imperative conflict.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: