Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[brainstorming] Adding image generation models as a type of agent?? #964

Open
5 tasks done
elisalimli opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
5 tasks done
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@elisalimli
Copy link
Contributor

⚠️ Please check that this feature request hasn't been suggested before.

  • I searched previous Ideas in Discussions didn't find any similar feature requests.
  • I searched previous Issues didn't find any similar feature requests.

🔖 Feature description

I think about adding image generation models as a new type of agent.

For instance:

workflows:
  - bedrock:
      model: bedrock/stability.stable-diffusion-xl-v0
      name: Image generator assistant
      intro: 👋 Hi there! How can I help search for answers on the internet.

Adding this as a new tool is another option, but I think it does not make sense to call an LLM inference API to call the tool. If we want to generate an image, it is always the case that we will choose that image gen tool. So, it would cause extra latency + cost. That's why I think adding image gen as a agent type is more viable option.

Acknowledgements

  • My issue title is concise and descriptive.
  • I have searched the existing issues to make sure this feature has not been requested yet.
  • I have provided enough information for the maintainers to understand and evaluate this request.
@elisalimli elisalimli added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 15, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 🆕 New in Superagent Apr 15, 2024
@elisalimli elisalimli self-assigned this Apr 15, 2024
@homanp
Copy link
Collaborator

homanp commented Apr 17, 2024

@elisalimli yes, good idea.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants